Hush - * 1/2*

One of the 90s’ most unwelcome thriller trends returns from the grave: it’s the “___ from Hell” movie! Starting in the early nineties, we were subjected to nearly every conceivable combination of relationships-from-Hell! There were Boyfriends from Hell, Friendly Neighborhood Cops from Hell, Nannies from Hell, and even Secretaries from Hell. But Hush has found an old standby that somehow was forgotten in the rush: The Mother-In-Law from Hell!!!!!

The mother-in-law in question is Martha, played by Jessica Lange. She has been single-handedly running the family horse farm, Kilronan. Her son, Jackson (Johnathon Schaech) and his girlfriend, Helen (Gwyneth Paltrow), live in New York, and have no intention to move back down south to the rural Kilronan. But those intentions are about to change.

You see, Martha lives by manipulation. She has used it in years past to breed many championship horses. Now, she believes she can use it to breed herself a grandson. Though at first, Helen finds Martha charming, soon she is caught in the domineering Martha’s web of deception.

It’s hard to understand why nobody ever wises up to Martha’ schemes. As written, most of the characters in the film must be very slow witted. But then, the film even treats the audience like idiots. It tries to get away with things (like leaving a critical piece of evidence in a rather unlikely place) without even batting an eye. Then again an audience which accepts characters as shallow as these isn’t one that’s likely to question details.

Jessica Lange’s Martha is the only semi-developed character in the film, and she applies her talents to redeem it as much as she can. A character that could have been simply awful is merely groan-worthy. Gwyneth Paltrow doesn’t have much to build upon, as Helen’s only character trait seems to be “daughter-in-law”. Still, she fares better than Johnathon Schaech, whose character is so nonexistent, he’s inexplicably missing for much of the film.

Still, there have been much worse “____ from Hell” films. Even with its paper-thin characters and ludicrous setups, Hush manages to create a few thrills in a color-by-numbers fashion. You know what’s coming, but occasionally the film will deliver a shock or two. The old formulas are around for a reason, but that doesn’t mean they taste fresh.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Hush

The Big Lebowski - * *

The Big Lebowski

The Coen Brothers have consistently released a string of quirky, offbeat, but highly entertaining films with only one minor stumble (Miller’s Crossing). While The Big Lebowski delivers more of their typical oddball characters and situations, it is an unfortunate disappointment. This time, they have all the parts together, but someone forgot the glue.

Jeff Bridges stars as “The Dude” Jeff Lebowski, but not The Big Lebowski. That appellation belongs to a millionaire (David Huddleston) who happens to have the same name as The Dude, but much bigger enemies. Or at least his trophy wife, Bunny (Tara Reid), does. But it doesn’t matter much to The Dude when those enemies, in a mix-up, come knocking on his door.

The Dude, you see, is a relic from the 60s. His hippie lifestyle has devolved over time into an endless haze of smoking marijuana, drinking White Russians, and bowling. His bowling partners don’t have much of a life either. There’s Walter (John Goodman), an obsessed Vietnam vet with a hair trigger, and an irrational devotion to his ex-wife. And then there’s the wimpish Donny (Steve Buscemi), who’s the team’s best bowler, but gets no recognition and little respect from his teammates.

So, as the Dude gets entangled in the plot, through no fault of his own, he meets a plethora of unusual characters. Julianne Moore appears as an uber-feministic artist. Peter Stormare is a German nihilist with an attack ferret. Coen regular John Turturro has a cameo as Jesus, a bowler with strange predilections. There’s even a cowboy, Sam Elliott, who narrates the tale.

However, the sensation this time around is like a bunch of jigsaw pieces from different puzzles hammered together. The Coen’s better work, such as Raising Arizona or Barton Fink, each had the same menagerie of bizarre characters, but in those films there was some sort of common thread that linked them all together. They all seemed to belong in the same world…something that’s not true of The Big Lebowski.

Taken on an individual basis, the characters are funny. Jeff Bridges does another superb turn in the film’s central role, enhancing his character with a seemingly effortless comic touch. Goodman’s outbursts are amusing, but they seem staged. Many of the other characters are overshadowed by their own quirks.

Visually, the film is a treat, particularly in the film’s elaborately staged dream sequences. They serve no narrative purpose in the film (like many other things), but they’re a hoot to watch.

The central problem with the film seems to be on the script level. There are plenty of good concepts and interesting characters, but the end result seems more like a scrapbook than a screenplay.

The Big Lebowski is a failure. But, on the bright side, it’s a Coen Brothers failure, so, even if the film has little point and even less cohesion, you’ve got quirky characters and strange situations to divert you.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Big Lebowski

The Real Blonde - * 1/2*

Tom Dicillo directs this superficial comedy about superficial people in superficial careers, all searching for deeper meaning. However, they won’t find much meaning in The Real Blonde, and not enough real humor, either.

Joe (Matthew Modine) is a struggling actor, or he claims to be one, even though he has no credits under his belt. His girlfriend, Mary (Catherine Keener) has no pretensions about her career: she’s a makeup artist, working for the eccentric fashion photographer Blair (Marlo Thomas) and supermodel of the month, Sahara (Bridgette Wilson).

Sahara, who has acquired a new age spirituality from repeated viewing of The Little Mermaid, has an on-again, off-again relationship with Joe’s best friend, Bob (Maxwell Caulfield). However, Bob has gotten his biggest break yet: a starring role on a soap opera opposite the beautiful Kelly (Daryl Hannah), who may be that illusive woman he’s always pursued: a real blonde.

There are some moments of good humor in The Real Blonde, but not enough. The best stuff is in throwaway details in the background, such as Sahara’s perfume ads: “Depression – It’s Not Just a State of Mind”. But to find humor in the superficiality of models and actors is to shoot fish in a barrel.

And, unfortunately, the film’s forays outside the realm of comedy are pathetic. Take for example the film’s framing device of an old lady and her dog. The story serves absolutely no purpose, makes little sense, and is completely tangential to the main plotlines of the movie.

Matthew Modine and Catherine Keener have the most sympathetic characters in the film, but they’re stuck in the most boring plotlines. Modine whines and complains and would be completely pathetic if he was matched against someone stronger than Elizabeth Berkley, who appears as another struggling actor. Keener’s character has a stronger edge, but the insult self-defense class (taught by Denis Leary, no less) she is stuck in makes little sense.

The movie’s running time is under two hours, but it seems like it is well over it. There’s just not enough humor to speed things along, and not enough meaning to propel any drama.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Real Blonde

Krippendorf’s Tribe - * * *

Krippendorf's Tribe

Krippendorf’s Tribe is a formula comedy. Done poorly, formulaic comedies might seem to signify the downfall of American cinema. However, every now and then one emerges, like Krippendorf’s Tribe, that actually works.

Professor James Krippendorf (Richard Dreyfuss), the renowned anthropologist, is in trouble. His university gave him a hefty grant to discover a lost tribe in New Guinea. However, he found…nothing. His wife has recently died, and he has spent the remainder of the grant money in raising his three kids: Shelly (Natasha Lyonne), Mickey (Gregory Smith) and Edmund (Carl Michael Lidner).

Tonight, he is expected to lecture on his newfound tribe. Rather than break the news (and face the consequences of misusing his funds), he invents a tribe: the Shelmikedmu (named after his kids). However, one lie begets another as he is not only required to deliver filmed proof of the Shelmikedmu, but his research becomes a popular phenomenon.

Soon, Professor Krippendorf is caught up in an elaborate ruse in which he films mockumentary footage starring his children as the Shelmikedmu tribal members. His efforts are hampered by the boasts of an over-eager colleague, Veronica Micelli (Jenna Elfman), and the intense scrutiny of a rival anthropologist, Ruth Allen (Lily Tomlin).

Krippendorf’s Tribe does seem to require a little suspension of disbelief. No one seems to question the way his field documentaries seem to be shot with multiple cameras, or that his newly discovered tribesmen have startlingly blue eyes. Luckily, as the film builds momentum, that suspension of disbelief is easy to come by.

Though there’s some mild humor in the Krippendorf family trying to pass themselves off as a lost tribe, the real humor of the film is in how James gets trapped in his ever increasing snowball of lies. The double meanings to many of the Shelmikedmu appearances are enjoyable, and the comic timing required for some of the film’s latter scenes is superb.

Richard Dreyfuss is terrific as the hapless professor who soon loses control of his own imaginary tribe. Jenna Elfman’s position as a romantic lead seems a bit forced at times, but she plays the part with extreme affability. Even the kids, who in films like this tend to be a bit on the precocious side, are endearing and humorous.

Yes, the film does veer occasionally into some rather lowbrow humor, but it has the best excuse of all: it’s funny. It may not go down as an all-time classic, but it certainly delivers what you expect from a comedy: plenty of laughs.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Krippendorf’s Tribe

Mrs. Dalloway - * *

Marleen Gorris directs this timid adaptation of Virginia Woolf’s novel, Mrs. Dalloway. There’s probably a point to be made, but the film lacks the confidence to make it.

Vanessa Redgrave plays the title role of Mrs. Clarissa Dalloway, wife of a successful politician. The film takes place primarily in London after WWI. Mrs. Dalloway is planning a party, but her life is thrown in disarray when she receives a visit from Peter Walsh (Michael Kitchen), a man who once loved her. She has come to think of herself purely in terms of her husband, so such a return of individuality is a shock to her.

There are several flashbacks to when they were young adults. Clarissa (here played by Natascha McElhone) is being wooed by both the wild Peter (Alan Cox) and the stiff Richard Dalloway (Robert Portal). Should she choose security or danger? Judging from the title, it’s not that surprising a decision.

Intercut with the action is a completely unrelated story of a shellshocked WWI soldier. Septimus Smith (Rupert Graves) has been mentally troubled since the war. His suicidal tendencies have baffled his wife, Rezia (Amelia Bullmore), who reluctantly seeks help.

The connection between these two stories is tenuous at best. The strongest parallel I could draw was that Mrs. Dalloway had been shellshocked in her own way, but coped with it differently. However, if that was the intended message, it is awfully muffled here.

In fact, the film flirts with several ideas, but it is much too tentative in its approach. For example, there’s a possible romantic interest between Clarissa and her friend Sally (Lena Headey), but it is unclear if this exists, or if there’s much thought behind it at all.

As the film progresses, it slowly gains confidence. By the time we reach Mrs. Dalloway’s party, everything finally clicks. With a swirling combination of Mrs. Dalloway’s mental commentary and some dizzying camerawork, the film sweeps us into a delightful stream-of-consciousness narrative.

But, overall, the film has difficulty overcoming its rather dry tone. If it proceeded with some early experimentation, some sort of energy might have brought it to life. But in the end, like its title character, the film chose the safe and timid way out…at the cost of its identity.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Mrs. Dalloway

Dangerous Beauty - * * * 1/2*

Dangerous Beauty

Marshall Herskovitz directs this alternatively comic and earnestly serious period piece based on the biography of a famous 16th century poet/courtesan, Veronica Franco.

As a girl, Veronica Franco (Catherine McCormack) has only eyes for Marco Venier (Rufus Sewell). Yet fate schemes to keep them apart. For, you see, this is 16th century Venice, where marriage is a political tool, and women are little more than property, their worthiness judged by their dowry. Marco comes from a high standing political family, and Veronica, alas, is poor.

However, there is a way out for Veronica. Her mother (Jacqueline Bisset) gives her the option of becoming a high-class prostitute, a courtesan, as she once was herself. Although it may seem appalling at first, the courtesan dwells amid luxury, freedom and riches. And (the point which wins Veronica over) courtesans are the only women in which education is encouraged, since they are the confidants and bedtime advisors of nobles and generals.

By taking this path, rather than following her friend, Beatrice (Moira Kelly), into the sheltered life of an arranged marriage, Veronica hopes to be Marco’s lover, since she can’t be his husband. But will Marco be accepting of the love of a courtesan?

Dangerous Beauty is at its best when it is lighthearted, a mood which dominates most of the film. However, there are moments, particularly in the film’s finale, when the film’s tone shifts to one of deadly seriousness. At such times, the dreadful self-importance threatens to overwhelm the film. Luckily, they don’t make up the bulk of the film. As long as you have an open mind about the film’s subject matter, the playful attitude of Dangerous Beauty wins out.

Catherine McCormack delivers a splendid performance as Veronica, believably running the gamut from innocent to…not so innocent, with an appropriate mix of inquisitiveness and longing. Though Rufus Sewell turns in a decent performance as her would-be lover, Oliver Platt steals the show as his penniless friend, Maffio, who engages Veronica in a battle of wits, while he secretly longs for her.

The film faithfully recreates 16th century Venice, with some stunning vistas along the canals. The beautiful scenery helps to enhance the atmosphere which made Venice one of the most decadent cities of its time.

Dangerous Beauty is anything but the stuffy period drama a cursory look might curse it to seem. As a lighthearted and funny look (most of the time) at 16th century mores, the movie is a delightful sweet to savor.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Dangerous Beauty

Palmetto - * 1/2*

Palmetto

An attempt at Florida film noir, Palmetto fails at the most fundamental levels. It’s slow moving, uninvolving, and plain just uninteresting.

Harry Barber (Woody Harrelson) is an ex-newspaper man, just out of jail after being framed for a crime. His luck hasn’t been the best, but things are looking up when a mysterious woman, Rhea Malroux (Elisabeth Shue), approaches him with a proposition. She wants Harry to help her and her stepdaughter, Odette (Chloe Sevigny), pull off a fake kidnapping scheme to get $500,000 out of her stingy, but rich, husband Felix (Rolf Hoppe).

At first, all Harry is expected to do is provide a threatening voice on the phone, and to collect the money (of which he gets to keep 10%). But, as the deed is carried out, things are not what they seem, and Harry gets caught in the ensuing storm.

Palmetto pulls out all the stops to achieve a film noir film, but the effect never quite comes together. It’s got the sultry Florida heat, seductive women, and even curvier plot twists, but the whole thing smells of paint-by-numbers. Sure, the right ingredients are there, but the end result is much too artificial.

A lot of the problems lie with the script, which, though providing some genuine surprises, is packed full of leaden dialogue and bland situations. Even the plot twists don’t seem to flow well with the rest of the story. Some of them, for example, come from so far afield that they seemingly only make sense because the writer needed a twist (for example: Harry’s spontaneous job offer, or the whole typewriter situation).

The characters are mostly lifeless, played to type, but not much more. Woody Harrelson plays Harry with such imbecilic thick-headedness that it’s hard to even picture him as an ex-journalist. Elisabeth Shue vamps it up, but doesn’t add anything special to the role. Chloe Sevigny gives a terrible performance, trying to be a sexy 17-year old, but she just leaves a bad taste in your mouth. Some of the supporting cast (notably Gina Gershon and Michael Rapaport) give stronger, but, in the end, meaningless performances.

And to top it off, the pacing of the film is much too slow. As the movie grinds to a halt, you’re given too much time to wonder why you’re wasting it watching Palmetto. If you’re in the mood for this type of movie, you’d be much better off going out and renting some classic film noir.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Palmetto

Senseless - *

Senseless is a prime example of what can happen when you try to push a one-joke concept a bit too far. Director Penelope Spheeris is no stranger to this, having subjected audiences before to such tortures as The Beverly Hillbillies.

Marlon Wayans stars as Darryl Witherspoon, a college senior vying for a lucrative job at a prominent brokerage. However, he lacks the advantages of his chief opposition, Scott Thorpe (David Spade, in the smarmy sort of role he can deliver in his sleep): an athletic record, sponsorship by a fraternity, and, most of all, a wealthy family to back him up. In fact, Darryl has to work at four jobs simply to make ends meet.

But there may be a light at the end of that tunnel. He signs up as a human guinea pig in a neurological experiment run by the university’s Dr. Wheedon (Brad Dourif). As a result, his senses are magnified tenfold. Using his newfound abilities, he sets himself in complete pursuit of the job (unaware that there may be some disadvantageous side-effects to having super senses).

Naturally, Marlon Wayans plays this comedy at full throttle, giving Jim Carrey-ish amounts of physical humor. The problem is, aside from a few genuinely inspired bits, there’s not much that’s funny here. The film has it’s one central gag, and pads out the rest of its length with rather obvious lowbrow humor.

There obviously wasn’t much thought put into the plot. The entire job selection process is completely ridiculous. I mean, why the emphasis on extra-curricular activities if the entire job is going to come down to a single-elimination quiz anyhow? And is this the only job being offered to economics majors this semester?

To give it credit, Senseless does try to create a secondary joke with Darryl’s roommate, Tim LaFlour (Matthew Lillard). Apparently, he is supposed to be faddish, but the film never does anything with him, leaving him in a piercing phase throughout the movie. His “intervention” scenes with Darryl, however, do provide a rare, and welcome, laugh.

And then there’s the love interest which is always pathetically tacked onto comedies like this one. In this case, the object of Darryl’s amor is Janice (Tamara Taylor), a fellow student who won’t have anything to do with Darryl until he gains his super-senses. Needless to say, the romance is completely extraneous, and adds little to the film.

This is a film that desperately needed something else. Be that a good plot, more jokes (or simply funnier ones), or a strong character or two, anything would have helped Senseless get off the ground. As it is, all the manic exuberant mugging in the world can’t help Marlon Wayans get this one off the ground.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Senseless

The Wedding Singer - * 1/2*

Adam Sandler turns up the charm in his latest romantic comedy, The Wedding Singer. Unfortunately, that also has the effect of softening his edge. He’s nowhere near his peak of Happy Gilmore, not that it was much of one. He’s certainly not helped here by a rather frail plot.

The year is 1985, letting the whole film obsess with 80s nostalgia. Adam Sandler is nice guy Robbie, the titular wedding singer, who entertains at the local reception hall by belting out his interpretations of classic 80s hits.

Robbie’s life is thrown into turmoil when his fiancee, Linda (Angela Featherstone), leaves him at the altar. However, things are looking up when he meets Julia (Drew Barrymore), a waitress at the hall. She’s the perfect woman, but for one small flaw: she’s engaged to be married to a slick junk bond king, Glenn (Matthew Glave).

So, most of the film deals with the slow realization by Robbie that he and Julia are in love, and his attempts to stop the wedding. As far as plots go, it’s a pretty thin and tired one.

To fill the gaps, The Wedding Singer delivers heaping spoonfuls of 1980s nostalgia. From Boy George to Michael Jackson, from Miami Vice to Dallas, from the first CDs to the last Rubik’s Cubes, this film revels in all the minutiae. And then there’s the music… Learning a lesson from the successful soundtracks to Grosse Pointe Blank, and Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion, this film packs more 80s songs in the film than the running time will allow. As a result, most songs get maybe a lyric or a half, but you can almost see the bright gleam in the record executives’ eyes: The Wedding Singer Vols. 2, 3, and 4!

While the nonstop 80s riffs get incredibly tiring, at least they distract you from the plot. At least last year’s My Best Friend’s Wedding stirred up the standard “keep your true love from marrying someone else” plot by making the rival a nice person. Here, Glenn is such a lowly rat of a man that you never see what Julia saw in him.

Barrymore, on the other hand, is simply charming as Julia. Which leaves us with Adam Sandler. He’s at his best in the film when his nice guy persona fades a little (such as when he has a breakdown on stage during a wedding reception). When he’s in full nice-guy mode, he’s more pathetic than endearing.

The film boasts several cameos (most notably by Steve Buscemi and Jon Lovitz). But none of them work well at all. Buscemi’s role as a drunken best man simply fails to be humorous. Lovitz, on the other hand, as a rival wedding singer, makes you long for his good old days on Saturday Night Live, where he was actually funny. The only cameo which has some appeal is a guest appearance by a classic 80s rocker during the film’s finale (surprisingly, one of the only plot-related scenes which actually works.)

Adam Sandler still has some work to do before he can become a dependable leading man. While he attempts to change his image in The Wedding Singer, the end result is no net gain.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Wedding Singer

Sphere - * * 1/2*

Sphere

For many years, Michael Crichton’s novel Sphere has sat around simply awaiting a film adaptation. However, unlike his more recent novels (which are almost published in screenplay format), Sphere makes an attempt at some genuine science fiction ideas…concepts which don’t lend themselves toward easy screen translation. But, finally, director Barry Levinson has tackled the screen project. The result, though, is mixed.

Several years ago, psychologist Norman Hoffman (Dustin Hoffman) drafted a report for the government detailing procedures for a possible first contact with an alien life form. Thinking it was a bureaucratic boondoggle, he whipped out a half-serious report that named several of his colleagues as members of the first contact team.

Now he has been called out to the South Pacific, where that very team has been assembled. There’s mathematician Harry Adams (Samuel L. Jackson), astrophysicist Ted Fielding (Liev Schreiber), and biochemist Beth Halperin (Sharon Stone), with whom Norman had a brief romantic fling several years before.

The team is there to investigate an alien spacecraft which apparently crashed into the bottom of the ocean 288 years before. Barnes (Peter Coyote), a military officer, is overseeing the operation, which involves transferring the team to a mobile habitat on the ocean floor. But they aren’t quite prepared for what is uncovered in the spacecraft…something mysterious and profound…but possibly deadly.

James Cameron tackled similar subjects, but with much greater success, in his 1989 underwater epic, The Abyss. Here, despite the talented cast, many of the shocks lack impact, and the wonders just don’t quite seem so wondrous.

Too often, it is left up to the dialogue to explain the mood and atmosphere. This is fine when the characters themselves are creating that mood, but when it is generated by their situation, the audience should be able to feel the dread without having it explained for us.

The cast is what saves this movie from being a disaster, though none of them are at the top of their form here. Hoffman manages to be the central link for the audience, even though his performance is rather flat. Samuel L. Jackson has a good turn as the mathematician who may think too much for his own good. Sharon Stone has the meatiest role, but never sells the audience that she is on the borderline of a breakdown.

A few of the sequences actually do work, and there are times when the film almost manages to create a mood. But these intermittent flaws eventually pass.

The film’s final revelation was a little hokey in the book, and is even more so when writ large upon the screen. The film strives to be profound, but ends up being forgettable.

There are gleams here and there of several intriguing ideas, but they’re never fully realized. If you relax and go with the flow, Sphere ends up being a mildly enjoyable, but, overall, an unsatisfactory experience. If you’re looking for truly thoughtful science fiction, go out and rent Contact, and skip the Sphere. However, if you’re just looking for a diversion, Sphere may fit your bill.

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sphere