The Online Film Critics Society 1997 Awards

The first annual Online Film Critics Society year-end awards have been announced:
BEST PICTURE: L.A. Confidential
BEST ACTOR: Jack Nicholson – As Good As It Gets
BEST ACTRESS: Judi Dench – Mrs. Brown
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: Burt Reynolds – Boogie Nights
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: Gloria Stuart – Titanic
BEST SCREENPLAY: L.A. Confidential – Curtis Hanson, Brian Helgeland
BEST DIRECTOR: James Cameron – Titanic
BEST DOCUMENTARY: Four Little Girls
BEST FOREIGN FILM: Shall We Dance

The Online Film Critics Society is the most influential organization of film critics whose reviews are posted primarily or exclusively on the internet or online services. There were 66 members registered as of January 10, 1998. The official website for the OFCS is located here.

Posted in Article | Comments Off on The Online Film Critics Society 1997 Awards

Firestorm - * 1/2*

You always have to be careful with the first official studio release out of the gate each year. They’re obviously films for which the studios have no great hopes (having missed both the deadline for Academy Award eligibility and the big box-office holiday season). Combine that with Howie Long’s first starring action role, and you’ve got a doozy of a movie that, while not as bad as it could have been, isn’t a very good film.

Howie stars as an ace smokejumper (a firefighter who parachutes into forest fires unreachable from the ground). In the slightly contrived opening scenes, we witness his heroism in action, as he, and his mentor (played by Scott Glenn) attempt to rescue a small girl and her dog from an oncoming forest fire.

William Forsythe plays the bad guy, a mass murderer who has several million dollars tucked away to help fund his jailbreak. He (and five convict cohorts) manages to get selected for firefighting duty when a woodland blaze just happens to ignite nearby. His escape plan bets a lot on the laxity of the guards, but (since there must be a movie) luck is with him. Soon the now-escaped convicts are masquerading as Canadian firefighters. Why Canadian? Who knows, eh? Along the way they pick up a pretty birdwatcher (Suzy Amis) to be their hostage.

Enter Howie Long. He’s called in to help fight the blaze, and when he spots the group of “ground pounders”, apparently lost, he parachutes in to help. When he discovers their true identity, he is the only thing standing between them and escape, and the only hope of help for the hostage.

Long’s acting talents are above those of, say, Steven Seagal, but not by much. Although his delivery is mostly flat and wooden, he’s a likeable hero, and there are some hints here and there that he may get better.

The script doesn’t help him out any, however. All too often, it veers into the realm of the unintentionally funny. The dialogue is strictly B-movie material, and the plotting relies too heavily on coincidences to be believable.

Long’s co-stars are a mixed bag. At least they’re all comfortable in their respective roles. Forsythe has the scenery-chewing villain down cold, down cold, and Scott Glenn is always enjoyable to watch, even when he doesn’t seem to be stretching his talents (as is definitely the case here). Suzy Amis plays peril pretty well, but isn’t given much more to do.

Some of the nature and wildfire shots are interesting, but many are rather bland. You’d think that the director, Dean Semler, a former cinematographer, would at least produce a film with interesting visuals. That’s not the case. There’s a lack of originality to nearly all the sequences…we’ve seen this stuff before.

It’s not the most auspicious start to 1998, but it could have been worse (just think back to 1996’s debut, Bio-Dome). However, after a month of Oscar-caliber pictures, a movie like Firestorm at least gives you some perspective on how good those movies really were. In fact, there’s a good chance that some of them are still playing near you…

Posted in 1998, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Firestorm

The Boxer - * * *

Director Jim Sheridan teams up again with Daniel Day-Lewis for another Irish saga. But this one, while enjoyable, doesn’t quite live up to their prior films.

Young “Danny Boy” Flynn (Daniel Day-Lewis) was a promising boxer in Belfast. His life was looking good. He had a wonderful girlfriend, Maggie (Emily Watson), and nowhere to go but up. Then he joined the IRA. He was later arrested, and sent to jail.

Fourteen years later, Danny returns to Belfast from prison to find a changed world. Maggie married his best friend, another IRA member now in jail. The Holy Family boxing club where he used to spar has dissolved, and his former trainer, Ike (Ken Stott), is now a doddering alcoholic.

But Ireland has changed too. Maggie’s father, Joe Hamill (Brian Cox), is an IRA leader who wants peace, as do the British. Negotiations are tenuous, however, and Joe’s hard-line lieutenant Harry (Gerard McSorley) would prefer the violence to continue.

Enter Danny. He doesn’t want to have anything more to do with the IRA… too many have died for his liking. He tries to restore the good parts of his old life: bringing back the Holy Family boxing club, and renewing his relationship with Maggie. However, neither of these are approved by Harry’s hard-line faction. The Holy Family is a non-sectarian club, and Maggie is a “prisoner’s wife”, aka untouchable.

Jim Sheridan directs The Boxer without the immediacy that marked his prior collaborations with Daniel Day-Lewis (My Left Foot and In the Name of the Father). For his own part, Daniel Day-Lewis has devoted himself completely to the role in the usual fashion. His boxing scenes are entirely convincing, and you never doubt either his political convictions or his later regrets.

The romance with Emily Watson works, though it never seems as scandalous as it is made out to be. Part of the problem is that her absent husband remains a complete enigma. The only relevant information we are given about him is that he used to be Danny’s best friend. However, neither Danny nor Maggie seem hesitant in the least to rekindle their relationship.

Director Sheridan walks the line in this film, taking neither side in the Irish conflict, instead condemning those who would prolong the violence. However, his film paints a truly fragile picture of the peace.

The Boxer is different from most other films about the conflict in Ireland in that it is neither a historical retelling, nor is it a paean for one side or the other. Instead it is a plea for peace, concerned primarily with ending the violence.

Posted in 1997, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Boxer

Oscar and Lucinda - * * 1/2*

Gillian Armstrong directs this quirky period romance that shines with good performances, but could have been tightened up to be a bit more effective.

Oscar Hopkins (Ralph Fiennes) is the timid son of a rigid puritanical father. Oscar casts his lot in life (literally), and studies to become an Anglican priest. He has two critical weaknesses, however. The first is a deathly fear of the water (which he associates with his mother’s death). The second is an uncontrollable love of gambling.

It is this second interest which sparks an attraction with Ludinda Leplastrier (Cate Blanchett). Raised in the wilds of Australia, Lucinda is surprised to find herself a very wealthy woman. She successfully gambles her fortune by starting a series of glasswork factories.

The two meet aboard a ship bound for Australia from England. Their penchant for gambling tosses them together, but they soon discover they are kindred souls.

The biggest problem with Oscar and Lucinda is its slow-moving pace. It is positively languid. None of the characters have immediacy, and as a result, even the film’s most moving moments lose their poignancy. There are some spots toward the end of the film that could have been very powerful…but that effect is blunted by the distance the audience has gone since then.

The performances throughout Oscar and Lucinda are well done. Ralph Fiennes delivers a good performance as the gambling priest, but considering his exceptional body of work, it is his weakest appearance. Cate Blanchett is intriguing in her role as the headstrong Lucinda, and the two of them make an appealing couple when together.

The cinematography in Oscar and Lucinda is appropriately pretty. The film creates some interesting images, mostly when it is following its motifs of glass and water. However, even with a prominent outdoor trek, the film never quite generates any stunningly beautiful scenes.

And that seems to sum up the good and the bad with the film. It is enjoyable, but there’s always a feeling that there could have been more. The end result is not completely satisfing.

Posted in 1997, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Oscar and Lucinda

Afterglow - * * *

Writer-director Alan Rudolph analyzes the deteriorating marriages of two couples in Afterglow. But while he gets a couple of good performances, the end result is as detached and distant as the marriages in the film.

Lucky and Phyllis Mann (Nick Nolte and Julie Christie) have a bruised, faltering marriage. After a tragic pivotal moment in their marriage several years before, the two have not been intimate, but, rather, each has retreated into a self-obsessed world to nurse their wounds. Lucky finds his release by tending to more than the plumbing at the homes he visits during his rounds as a fix-it man. Phyllis, an ex-B-movie-actress, compulsively watches her old movies and dwells on what might have been.

Another couple, Jeffrey and Marianne Byron (Jonny Lee Miller and Lara Flynn Boyle), are having marital problems of their own. Jeffrey is so entirely focused on his work that he gives the cold-shoulder to his wife. Marianne, hungry for affection, resolves to have a baby, with or without her husband.

The two marriages begin to entwine when Marianne sets her sights upon Lucky to be the father of her child. Meanwhile, unaware of their spouse’s deeds, Phyllis and Jeffrey kick off an affair of their own.

The obvious strength of the film is its acting, particularly by the Manns. Julie Christie returns to fine form as the most complex character in the film. Nolte does nearly as good a job as the emotionally numb fix-it man. The younger actors have a tough time keeping up. Lara Flynn Boyle is sympathetic as Mrs. Byron, but we never get a look inside Jonny Lee Miller’s head. His character is intensely unlikable, and is constantly doing strange things, but we never get a sense of why.

Beyond its characters, Afterglow begins to stall. The plotting of the film relies too heavily on coincidence, and with all the affairs going on, there is no real sense of passion in the film. That very well may be the point, but it lends itself to a rather tedious viewing experience.

Still, as a character piece, the film does keep you interested. Eventually, the film begins to unwrap its characters, it just takes its own sweet time in doing so. The end result is slightly interesting, but not enthralling.

The film is best seen as an acting showcase, and in that light it glows. Not too brightly, but enough to be mildly diverting.

Posted in 1997, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Afterglow

Wag the Dog - * * * 1/2*

Wag the Dog

Director Barry Levinson has crafted a wickedly funny political satire, that, while consistently tickling your funny bone, rings astoundingly true.

The President of the United States has a problem. The election is only a few days away, and a devastating scandal is brewing. After a one-on-one meeting with the President, a young Firefly Girl scout accuses the commander-in-chief of sexual misconduct. Normally a scandal as despicable at this one would ground a standard campaign. However, the President has brought in Conrad Brean (Robert De Niro), spin doctor extraordinaire.

Conrad plans a diversionary tactic. He needs a story that will distract the press until the election. What greater distraction could there be than a war? He concocts a fictional war against Albania, and to pull it off, he enlists the talents Hollywood producer Stanley Moss (Dustin Hoffman). Together, the two conspire to create a masterful imaginary war, one which will be completely convincing to the media and the gullible American public.

The pair gather around them an interesting menagerie to pull off the scam. Stanley pulls in such diverse characters as the Fad King (Denis Leary), who’s got his finger on the pulse of popular culture, and country singer Johnny Green (Willie Nelson), who tries to come up with a popular theme for a popular war. And, since every war needs a hero, they dig up Sgt. William Schumann (Woody Harrelson), a nutcase of a soldier who they set up to be an idol to the country.

Probably the most disturbing thing about Wag the Dog is its utter plausibility. Although the whole thing is way over the top, there’s a kernel of truth underlying every step taken in the film.

De Niro and Hoffman are obviously having a ball in this movie, and their sheer enthusiasm rubs off. Hoffman, by a narrow margin, gives the better performance of the two, as the eternally optimistic producer who’s got a million stories to tell.

The supporting cast is terrific as well, particularly the five-beers-short-of-a-six-pack sergeant Harrelson, Anne Heche as a Presidential press secretary who is amazed at the level of deception that Conrad and Stanley manage to create, and William H. Macy as a CIA agent who may be on to the whole scheme, but isn’t quite ready to match wits with Conrad.

Wag the Dog is easily one of the year’s best comedies, and one of the best political comedies to come around in a long, long time.

Posted in 1997, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Wag the Dog

Kundun - * * 1/2*

Kundun

And here we have the second film of the year to tell the tale of the Dalai Lama. First came Seven Years in Tibet, an interesting, yet somehow uninformative view of the Dalai Lama’s live, from a decidedly Western outsider’s perspective. Kundun gets a bit more in depth, and tells the story from the inside, yet it could have used some of the energy of the earlier film to enliven the tale.

Martin Scorsese directs this tale of the life of the Dalai Lama (played at various ages by Tenzin Yeshi Paichang, Tulku Jamyang Kunga Tenzin, Gyurme Tethong, and Tenzin Thuthob Tsarong). The fourteenth reincarnation of the Buddha of Compassion, the young Kundun is located at a young age on the Tibetan border.

Groomed to be the spiritual ruler of his country, the Dalai Lama faces an insurmountable challenge: the rise of Red China. The Chinese have long considered Tibet to be their province, and after the Communists take control, they invade.

Soon, the Dalai Lama is forced to choose between staying to lead his people in Tibet, or fleeing the country (which may be a better way to lead his people).

The film’s strongest suit is it’s beauty, both visually and aurally. The cinematography is simply stunning, and Philip Glass’ unique musical score only enhances the pleasure.

The all-Tibetan cast does a decent job…it’s hard to spot that many of them aren’t professional actors. Rather than using subtitles, the performers all speak English (though it does get a bit disconcerting when an occassional line or two is spoken in another language…why not translate it as well?)

The first problem with the film is with the character of the Dalai Lama. The film depicts him reverently, but as a result we are kept at a distance. The character is never humanized to the extent that we can empathize with him. Instead, he seemingly makes his decisions in a vacuum…we never quite know why he does the things he does…only that he does them.

And then there’s the pacing of Kundun. The film is painfully slow at times. It only runs a little over two hours, but it seems like three plus. The only conflict in the film comes with the arrival of China near the end, and that is not enough to propel the weight of the entire movie.

The insider’s point of view presents an interesting dilemma. While it does enable a more intimate portrait of the spiritual leader, it adds another obstacle for outsiders (such as the audience) from understanding the film. Many of the ceremonies and rituals in the film go unexplained, and it’s up to the audience to decide if they were important or merely decorative.

The end result might be beautiful, but it is distant and slow. It’s like looking at an exquisite flower…from a hundred yards away…for over two hours straight.

Posted in 1997, Movie Reviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Kundun

The Postman - * * 1/2*

The Postman

Kevin Costner returns to directing with a film that, on the outset, looks like a cross between Dances With Wolves and Waterworld. That description, however, doesn’t completely fit this postapocalyptic western (based on the novel by David Brin), which is mildly entertaining if you look past the cheese.

Set in the year 2013, the world has undergone almost every crisis imaginable. There has been nuclear war, and a following nuclear winter (which has just finally blown over), plague has struck the major cities, and riots and civil war have toppled the government. Amid all this, a fascist leader named Richard Holn has started a militaristic cult (the Holnists). Although Holn has died, the cult lives on under the rule of General Bethlehem (Will Patton), and continues to terrorize the populace.

Individual communities have survived, though without power and with dwindling supplies, things have regressed. Former suburbs have been stockaded like towns out of the old west, and animals have once again become the chief source of transportation.

Amid all this ruin, a lone man (Kevin Costner) wanders from town to town in search of food and shelter. At first, he gains these as a wandering entertainer, delivering one-man Shakespearean plays to the populace. However, later on he discovers a more elaborate ploy.

He accidentally stumbles across a postal truck, crashed and forgotten almost 15 years before. He dons the postal uniform, and at the next town he weaves a tall tale. He claims that the U.S. government has been restored back east. He has been sent to reestablish communication routes, and the restored Congress has decreed that all settlements must provide postal workers with food and shelter.

His ploy works…overwhelmingly so. He is struck by the town’s unquenchable thirst for knowledge about the “new government”. To them, he is a figure of hope, and they drown him in requests and letters to deliver to their lost loved ones. He is even asked by a local girl, Abby (Olivia Williams), to impregnate her (since her husband was rendered sterile by disease).

The postman travels from town to town, using the same scam to the same degree of success. However, he soon find his legend has outgrown himself. He discovers a settlement of young followers (led by Larenz Tate), who idolize him as a superhuman figure, and who have devoted themselves to establishing communication lines between the local communities. All of this flies in the face of General Bethlehem, who sees himself as the feudal lord of these settlements, and he sets out to destroy the bringer of hope: the postman.

Overall, The Postman depicts a post-apocalypse world more believable than many we’ve seen before on film (in movies such as Waterworld or The Road Warrior). The fact that shortages are occurring in a society without structure is something that never seemed to occur to its oil-guzzling predecessors.

The movie’s biggest flaw is its editing. At nearly three hours in length, there’s wasn’t much editing done, but what limited editing there is is done poorly. The movie breaks up into a confusing jumble during any of its montage sequences (the most prominent example is in the buildup to the finale, where what is going on makes absolutely no sense until you get there and understand what the filmmakers were trying to hint at).

Another problem with the film, which is more easily overlooked, is its overall hokey tone. Even if you are successful in wresting yourself away from the modern world’s cynical view of the postal service, some of the film’s key moments are so over-the-top in their earnestness that they border on the hillarious, handily defeating the purpose. Two key examples: a little girl “spontaneously” stepping out of the crowd to “touchingly” sing America the Beautiful, and an overdone scene involving a little boy trying to hand deliver a letter to the postman as he rides by (a scene which is recalled once again, to an unintentionally humorous effect, later in the film).

Still, with all its faults, there are a few interesting “epic-worthy” scenes in The Postman, and the underlying concept (of an unwilling messiah) is interesting and deserved to be explored more fully.

Posted in 1997, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Postman

Mr. Magoo - 1/2*

What’s there to say about Mr. Magoo? A series of short one-joke cartoons has now been expanded to an hour-and-a-half live action movie. Does anyone even expect this one to be any good? Well, if you do, you’ll be disappointed.

Leslie Neilsen plays the title character. Everyone always has fond memories of Mr. Neilsen, but when you think of it, it’s been almost a decade since Neilsen’s been in anything funny, and there’s no exception here. He captures Magoo’s baldness, squint and barking laugh, but little else.

For those of you unfamiliar with the cartoon, the joke is as follows: Mr. Magoo is nearsighted, and constantly mistakes objects for other objects (usually treating harmful objects as harmless ones)…however, he always miraculously comes through safe and unaware.

The plot of the movie, such as it is, goes as follows. Two bumbling jewel theives (Kelly Lynch and Nick Chinlund) steal a priceless ruby, but their treasure accidentally falls into the possession of Mr. Magoo. So the blissfully unaware Magoo is being hunted not only by the bumblinb thieves but by two bumbling government agents (Stephen Tobolowsky and Ernie Hudson), who believe Magoo is the actual thief.

Somehow the action proceeds from a local harbor, to a ski lodge, to the jungles of South America. But througout it all, one thing remains constant: the lack of any genuine laughs.

The film has the misfortune to be bookended (in the opening and closing credits) by the actual Mr. Magoo cartoon. While hardly a laugh riot, it just shows how far off the mark the film goes.

Not as numerous as in Flubber, but just as annoying, are several Disney product placements (from 101 Dalmatians to Euro-Disney). Typically, I’m not opposed to actual products appearing in films…it actually adds to the realism. Look around you…how many generic items do you see? However, aside from casual placement, when the film goes out of its way to promote a product at the expense of entertainment, it is very irritating. Such is the case here.

Cartoon adaptations are difficult to do correctly, but they can be done. Just take a look at George of the Jungle as a recent example. However, more often than not they fail. Take a look at the countless bad TV series-to-movie adaptations, and remember that the TV shows have a lot more material to start out with.

The only real laugh in the movie comes at the very end, when Disney has plastered a large politically correct disclaimer on the film. The blind and those with poor vision don’t need an apology…they should be thankful that they don’t have to watch garbage like this.

Posted in 1997, Movie Reviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Mr. Magoo

Jackie Brown - * * 1/2*

Jackie Brown

Quentin Tarantino finally has rolled around to directing another feature film after hitting the big time with Pulp Fiction. This time around he is adapting the Elmore Leonard novel Rum Punch (with a couple of significant character changes), rechristened Jackie Brown.

Samuel L. Jackson stars as Ordell Robbie, a wicked gun dealer. His associates are rather colorful characters. There’s Melanie (Bridget Fonda), his drug-happy surf bunny girlfriend. Beaumont (Chris Tucker) is a fast talking but jail-phobic associate of Robbie’s. Louis Gara (Robert DeNiro) is an aging bank robber, recently out of jail, who comes into Robbie’s employ. And then there’s Jackie Brown.

Jackie Brown (Pam Grier) is a flight attendant who, on the side, runs money for Ordell. However, during one of her money runs, she is apprehended by an ATF agent (Michael Keaton), who wants nothing better than to lock Robbie away for life…and he’s perfectly willing to use Jackie as bait.

However, Jackie has other plans. She enlists the aid of a sympathetic bail bondsman, Max Cherry (Robert Forster), to run a scam pitting the feds vs. the murderous Robbie. But will she manage both to stay alive and out of jail???

There is only one shocking twist in Jackie Brown (surprising, considering that the twists were some of the high points in his previous films.) In fact, the storyline is mostly straightforward. The film actually drags on a bit too long, and several of the scenes could have easily been shortened.

The highlight of Jackie Brown is the dialogue, which is colorful and funny. However, the film lacks any of the standout dialogue scenes that have highlighted Tarantino’s previous films (such as the “Like a Virgin” spiel in Reservior Dogs, or the “Royale With Cheese” conversation in Pulp Fiction.)

Pam Grier gives a good performance in the title role. However, it’s a mere shell of a character…particularly for a title role. We know very little about her, other than the fact that she’s desperate and clever.

Tarantino’s third full length directoral effort is a good film, but the worst of the three. Still, considering what he had to live up to, it’s not a bad effort.

Posted in 1997, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Jackie Brown